Chest wall & trauma
Chest trauma, rib fractures and flail chest
Chest wall injury is one of my principal clinical interests. I perform surgical rib fixation and chest wall reconstruction, which puts me in a position to say not only what was done but what could have been done — a distinction that decides a large number of these claims.
Where these instructions come from
Three routes into this work
01
Personal injury Road traffic collisions, falls from height, workplace crush injuries and assaults. Chest injury accounts for a substantial proportion of serious trauma and rib fractures are among the commonest injuries in road traffic collisions. Reports here are usually on condition and prognosis: what the ongoing disability is, whether it will resolve, what treatment remains available, and what the effect is on work and care needs.02
Clinical negligence Failure to identify significant chest injury, failure to recognise deterioration, inadequate analgesia leading to respiratory complications, failure to consider surgical fixation where it was indicated, and complications of intervention.03
Criminal and inquest work Mechanism, force, survivability and whether different management would have altered the outcome. Covered separately on the criminal and inquest page.The issues I am asked about
Five recurring questions
Plain radiography significantly under-detects rib fractures, and the adequacy of initial imaging is frequently in issue. Whether CT was indicated, and whether the injury pattern identified should have prompted further imaging or a period of observation.
Undertreated rib fracture pain leads to splinting, retained secretions, atelectasis and pneumonia. In the elderly the sequence is a recognised cause of death. Whether the analgesic strategy — including regional techniques — was appropriate to the injury and to the patient is a live issue in a growing number of claims.
Surgical stabilisation of rib fractures has moved from rarity to established option for flail chest and for selected severely displaced fracture patterns. Whether fixation was considered, whether the patient was discussed with a unit that performs it, and whether the failure to consider it was reasonable at the relevant date, are questions I am asked increasingly often. The answer depends heavily on when the events occurred, and I set out the state of practice at the material time rather than at today’s date.
Respiratory failure following chest wall injury is usually preceded by observable deterioration. Whether it was observed, escalated and acted on.
Chronic chest wall pain after rib fracture is common, under-recognised and frequently the largest component of quantum. Non-union, malunion, intercostal neuralgia, costochondral injury and post-traumatic slipping rib syndrome all produce persistent pain that is real, treatable in some cases, and often dismissed at earlier stages of the claim.
Condition and prognosis
What I address
Points that often need correcting
Three assumptions I see in earlier reports
“Rib fractures heal in six weeks.”
Fractures unite in that period in most patients. Pain frequently does not, and the assumption that pain must have resolved because union has occurred is one of the commonest errors I see in earlier reports.
“The pain is not organic.”
Persistent post-traumatic chest wall pain has identifiable structural causes in a substantial proportion of cases, including non-union, hardware problems, costal cartilage injury and slipping rib. A negative plain radiograph does not exclude any of them.
“Nothing more can be done.”
Where a structural cause is identified, treatment is often available. That changes both the prognosis and, sometimes, the direction of the quantum evidence.
What I will need
Records
- Ambulance and emergency department records
- All imaging as images, including any CT
- Inpatient records with observation and analgesia charts
- Physiotherapy notes
- Subsequent GP and pain clinic records
- The claimant’s own account of their current limitations
Discuss a case
Fifteen minutes on the telephone, free of charge. I will tell you whether the issues fall within my expertise before anything is committed to paper.
Discuss a case